Secondary peritoneal echinococcosis causing massive bilateral hydronephrosis and renal failure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 64-year-old Moroccan man was referred to our clinic for abdominal cystic echinococcosis (CE). He had undergone surgery for hepatic CE 29 years earlier, with no perioperative prophylaxis with albendazole. He presented with abdominal distension and abdominal pain. An ultrasound (US) showed multiple CE3b and CE4 cysts with calcifications and two echo-free collections 13 cm in diameter seen on paraumbilical scans (Figure 1a) . The portal tract, pancreas, spleen, kidneys, and aorta were not visible on US. The bladder was compressed by a large cyst. Serology for Echinococcus granulosus was positive (indirect hemagglutination test titer 1/4096; Echinococcus IgG ELISA optical density 6.70). A computed tomography (CT) scan showed disseminated peritoneal echinococcosis, multiple CE3b and CE4 cysts of up to 15 cm in diameter, and severe bilateral hydronephrosis, which looked like giant echinococcal cysts on US (Figure 1b). The patient had been on hemodialysis three times a week since 2008 due to worsening renal function and was on albendazole (400 mg twice daily). The surgeons refused an intervention for fear of exposing the patient to bleeding complications. Disseminated peritoneal CE may result from fluid spillage during hepatic surgery for CE and its consequences may go beyond mechanical distension and impair vital organ function.1Majbar M.A. Souadka A. Sabbah F. Raiss M. Hrora A. Ahallat M Peritoneal echinococcosis: anatomoclinical features and surgical treatment.World J Surg. 2012; 36: 1030-1035Crossref PubMed Scopus (19) Google Scholar Failure to administer perioperative prophylaxis may have serious long-term consequences. Conflict of interest: No conflict of interest to declare.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".