MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1997004612 · doi:10.5737/1181912x114192198

The impact and management of cancer-related fatigue on patients and families

2001· article· en· W1997004612 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Joan Hamilton, Lorna Butler, Hieke Wagenaar, Terry Sveinson, K Ward, Leslie D. McLean, Donna Grant, Florence MacLellan

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Oncology Nursing Journal · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer survivorship and care
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreDalhousie UniversityQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychological interventionChronic fatigueChronic fatigue syndromeCancer-related fatigueMedicineCancerLung cancerPhysical therapyPsychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fatigue has been identified as both a chronic and recurrent problem for individuals diagnosed with and treated for cancer, yet there is little information on how to manage the impact of fatigue. Describing what happens to individuals and their families as a result of fatigue and identifying what individuals do to manage or reduce the impact of fatigue are essential elements in determining multidimensional nursing interventions. The purpose of this pilot study was to examine the impact of fatigue on individuals with cancer of the lung and their families, and explore how they managed as a result of the fatigue. A semi-structured interview guide was used with 22 lung cancer patients and 14 family members six weeks post completion of radiation therapy. Results indicated that fatigue was not reported as a major concern by many of the participants in this study. For those who did experience fatigue, it was considered an inconvenience and a frustration that had to be dealt with for a limited time period. Some patients appeared to gradually adjust and accommodate to the fatigue and were not really aware of the changes that took place over time. Over half of the family members felt more of the impact of fatigue than did their loved ones. Family subtly assumed or took over responsibilities and activities the patient could no longer perform. The symptom of fatigue has been well documented in the cancer experience as both a chronic and recurrent problem for individuals diagnosed with and treated for cancer. The emphasis of previous work has been on deriving a conceptual definition of fatigue, achieving consensus on a definition, and developing theoretical frameworks to guide further study of this complex construct. Fatigue has been conceptualized as a multidimensional phenomenon, attributable to multiple causes and having a negative effect on quality of life (Piper, 1993; Tiesinga, Dasson, & Halfens, 1996). Describing what happens to individuals and their families as a result of fatigue and identifying what individuals do to manage or reduce the effects caused by the fatigue are essential elements in determining multidimensional nursing interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.825
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Oncology Nursing JournalSame topicCancer survivorship and careFrench-language works237,207