MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PERINDOPRIL IS EFFECTIVE TO SIGNIFICANTLY LOWER BLOOD PRESSURE IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS UNTREATED OR UNCONTROLLED ON PREVIOUS TREATMENTS: FINDINGS OF THE CONFIDENCE TRIAL: PP.27.72

2010· article· en· W1997007219 on OpenAlexaffabout
G.O. Tsoukas, Supraja Anand, Katie Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hypertension · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Canadian institutionsDr. Georges-L.-Dumont University Hospital CentreMontreal General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerindoprilMedicineBlood pressureInternal medicineACE inhibitorAngiotensin-converting enzymeProteinuriaPopulationUrologyCardiologyKidney

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims: To assess the blood pressure (BP) lowering efficacy of perindopril 4 to 8 mg/day (equivalent to perindopril arginine 5 to 10 mg/day) in patients whose hypertension was untreated or uncontrolled despite treatment with other antihypertensive drugs. Patients and Methods: This is an open-label, multicenter, observational trial conducted in Canadian general practice clinics. Patients (n = 8208; age: 59 ± 13.1 years) with uncontrolled hypertension (i.e. seated BP above 140/90 mm Hg or 130/80 mm Hg in the presence of diabetes, renal disease, or proteinuria) were prescribed perindopril 4 mg/day. Patients who were previously receiving other ACE inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) were switched to perindopril 4 mg/day. At visit 2 (after 14 to 28 days), dosage of perindopril could be increased to 8 mg/day in cases of failure to achieve BP control. Follow-up was over 12 weeks. Results: Perindopril significantly reduces BP among the overall population and the different subgroups as summarized in the table below. One third of patients required uptitration to the high dosage for higher normalization rate. Uptitration to 8 mg provided an additional mean 10.1/5.3 mm Hg BP reduction, which was even greater among severely hypertensive patients (15.1/5.7 mm Hg). Switching previous ACE inhibitor or ARB to perindopril resulted in reduced BP by a further 15.5/7.7 and 15.9/8.2 mm Hg, respectively. Perindopril was well tolerated, including when it replaced treatment with other ACEIs or ARBs. Conclusions: This trial demonstrates that a perindopril-based strategy uptitrated to the maximal dose as required for BP control, significantly reduces SBP and DBP in untreated or uncontrolled hypertensive patients irrespective of their previous treatment. These findings, combined with its proven risk reduction in myocardial infarction, stroke, and death, make perindopril an optimal treatment for a wide range of hypertensive patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HypertensionSame topicBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesFrench-language works237,207