Effects of Grain Size and Texture on the Biocompatibility of Commercially Pure Titanium
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ultra fine grained (UFG) pure titanium fabricated by severe plastic deformation techniques has been recently considered for biomedical applications. In this study, the effects of grain size and crystallographic orientation on the biocompatibility of commercially pure titanium have been evaluated. Samples having significant differences in terms of average grain size (from 0.4 to 20 mm) and crystallographic textures have been produced using equal channel angular pressing (ECAP) and compared. X-ray diffraction and electron back scattered diffraction (EBSD) were used to document the texture and microstructural properties. Cell attachment tests were done to study the biocompatibility of the samples using MC3T3 pre-osteoblast cells. The number of attached cells was found to be higher on the samples having more (0002) plane parallel to the surface regardless of their grain sizes. It was concluded that the texture plays a more significant role than the grain size in the biocompatibility of pure titanium.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".