MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1997042516 · doi:10.1109/ultsym.2011.0589

A Monte Carlo study on the effects of erythrocyte oxygenation on photoacoustic signals

2011· article· en· W1997042516 on OpenAlexafffund
Ratan K. Saha, Michael C. Kolios

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchTerry Fox FoundationCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsMonte Carlo methodSaturation (graph theory)PhysicsAlgorithmComputer scienceCombinatoricsMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A theoretical model to study the effects of erythrocyte oxygenation on photoacoustic (PA) signals is described. An erythrocyte was considered as a fluid sphere and for such a sphere the PA field was computed by using a frequency domain approach. The linear superposition principle was used to obtain the resultant PA field generated by a collection of red blood cells (RBCs). A Monte Carlo algorithm was used to simulate 2D tissue realizations consisting of oxygenated RBCs (RBCOs) and deoxygenated RBCs (RBCDs). The oxygen saturation level of RBCOs was assumed to be 100% and 0% for RBCDs. The proportion of RBCOs and RBCDs fixed the oxygen saturation (SO2) of a blood sample as, SO2= NO/(NO+ ND), where NOand NDrepresent the numbers of RBCOs and RBCDs. The simulation results showed that the mean PA signal amplitude decreased monotonically as the SO2level increased for the 700 nm laser radiation. The same quantity exhibited a monotonic rise as the SO2level increased for the 1000 nm optical source. The PA amplitude demonstrated nearly 6 fold decrease and 5 fold increase, respectively at those wavelengths when SO2level varied from 0 to 100%. Spectral intensity in the low frequency range (2. However, these trends were not distinctly observed between 10-100 MHz. The simulated trends were in accordance with other experimental works. This suggests the suitability of this formulation to model the PA signal behaviors at different SO2levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic ImagingFrench-language works237,207