<i>Trans</i>-interaction of nephrin and Neph1/Neph3 induces cell adhesion that associates with decreased tyrosine phosphorylation of nephrin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Slit diaphragms are specialized junctions between glomerular epithelial cells (podocytes) that are crucial for glomerular ultrafiltration. The Ig superfamily members nephrin and Neph1 are essential components of the slit diaphragm, whereas the role of Neph1 homologue Neph3 in the slit diaphragm is unknown. In the present paper we show that Neph3 homodimerizes and heterodimerizes with nephrin and Neph1. We further investigated whether these interactions play a role in cell adhesion by using mouse L fibroblasts that lack endogenous cell-adhesion activity and found that Neph1 and Neph3 are able to induce cell adhesion alone, whereas nephrin needs to trans-interact with Neph1 or Neph3 in order to promote formation of cell-cell contacts. Tyrosine phosphorylation of nephrin was down-regulated after nephrin trans-interacted with either Neph1 or Neph3 leading to formation of cell-cell contacts. We further found that the expression of Neph3 was increased in nephrin-deficient mouse podocytes. The findings of the present paper show that nephrin and Neph1 or Neph3 trans-interactions promote cell-contact formation, suggesting that they may also function together in slit diaphragm assembly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".