MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1997062928 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1596

X-ray and radio observations of the γ Cygni supernova remnant G78.2+2.1

2013· article· en· W1997062928 on OpenAlexaff
D. A. Leahy, Kaylie Green, S. Ranasinghe

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsROSATPhysicsAstrophysicsSupernova remnantNebulaSupernovaAstronomySpectral lineSkyStarsGalaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We analyse ROSAT and Chandra Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer (ACIS) X-ray observations and H i absorption spectra of the γ Cygni supernova remnant (G78.2+2.1, DR4). The ROSAT All-Sky Survey image shows that G78.2+2.1 has an adjacent limb-brightened shell north of it. A new ROSAT mosaic shows details of the X-ray emission over the entire face of G78.2+2.1. We also create Chandra mosaics that cover much of the northern rim and central regions of G78.2+2.1. The H i absorption spectra result in the association of G78.2+2.1 with the γ Cygni nebula, with a distance of 1.7–2.6 kpc. The Chandra spectra for G78.2+2.1 give an X-ray temperature of 0.6–1.2 keV (90 per cent error), and they show that a Sedov model has an age of 6800–10 000 yr. A compact power-law X-ray source in G78.2+2.1 is consistent with the same distance as G78.2+2.1. The northern X-ray shell is identified with a B3 star at a distance of 980 pc and it is proposed that this is a stellar wind bubble.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207