MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A subunit vaccine candidate region of theEntamoeba histolytica galactose-adherence lectin promotes interleukin-12 gene transcription and protein production in human macrophages

2000· article· en· W1997067191 on OpenAlexafffund
Darren Campbell, Barbara J. Mann, Kris Chadee

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Immunology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAmoebic Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersMedical Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMedical Research Council CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsBiologyEntamoeba histolyticaLectinMolecular biologyProtein subunitImmune systemMannan-binding lectinMicrobiologyGeneImmunologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cysteine-rich region of the 170-kDa subunit galactose-adherence lectin (Gal-lectin) of Entamoeba histolytica is a subunit vaccine candidate and a protective antigen in the gerbil model of amebiasis. Macrophage-mediated immunity is important for protection against E. histolytica and is activated by Th1 cytokines. As Th1 differentiation is promoted by IL-12, we investigated what portion of the Gal-lectin could stimulate IL-12 in human THP-1 macrophages. Native Gal-lactin stimulated IL-12 p40 / p35 mRNA expression in a dose- and time-dependent manner as measured by reverse transcriptase-PCR. Human immune serum and Gal-lectin mAb inhibition studies identified amino acids (aa) 596 - 998 as immunogenic and containing the IL-12 inducing domain. IFN-gamma priming augmented Gal-lectin-induced IL-12 mRNA expression independent of TNF-alpha and IL-1beta, and was required for IL-12 p70 protein production from macrophages and human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Gal-lectin plus IFN-gamma stimulated IL-12 p40 and p35 gene transcription with stable mRNA transcripts and a differential requirement for protein synthesis. These results suggest that aa 596 - 998 of the Gal-lectin can confer Th1-mediated protection against amebiasis through IL-12 induction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.542
Threshold uncertainty score0.442

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of ImmunologySame topicAmoebic Infections and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207