The effects of Posture on seat-to-head Whole-Body Vibration Transmission
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Five male subjects were exposed to root-mean-square whole-body vibration (WBV) acceleration levels ranging from 0.011m/s 2 to 0.615m/s 2 while seated on a vibration simulator. During the WBV exposure, subjects adopted 5 unsupported trunk flexion/extension positions (15, 10, 0, −10 and −15, ±2.5 degrees from vertical), and 4 hip flexion positions (−10, 0, 10, and 20 degrees from the horizontal). WBV measurements were taken with a tri-axial accelerometer at the buttock/seat interface and the head. Hydrostatic weighing was also conducted to determine the subject's adipose content. Adipose content of the individual had no significant relationship with the seat-to-head transmission of vibration. Vibration exposures at 4Hz had significantly more transmission than vibration exposures at 6.3Hz. Vibration exposures in the Z-axis (vertical) had significantly more vibration transmission than vibration exposures in the X- (front-to-back) and Y-axes (left-to-right). A significant interaction was also found between trunk position, frequency and axis of exposure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".