Detection of TAP Family Dimerizations by an<i>in Vivo</i>Assay in Mammalian Cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The transporter associated with antigen presentation (TAP) is an ATP-binding cassette (ABC) protein which transports peptides for presentation to the immune system. TAP is composed of two half transporters, TAP1 (ABCB2) and TAP2 (ABCB3), which heterodimerize to function. In humans, the TAP family consists of TAP1, TAP2, and TAPL (ABCB9). While the TAP1-TAP2 complex is well characterized, TAPL's dimerization state and function are unknown. To identify interactions within the human TAP family, we adapted the dihydrofolate reductase protein-fragment complementation assay (DHFR PCA) to half ABC transporters. This assay has been shown to be suitable for the study of membrane-bound proteins in vivo [Remy, I., Wilson, I. A., and Michnick, S. W. (1999) Science 283, 990-993]. With this method, in vivo TAP1-TAP2 heterodimerization was confirmed, no homodimerizations were detected with TAP1 or TAP2, and TAPL did not show any interaction with TAP1 or TAP2. However, we found strong evidence that TAPL forms homodimers. These results provide evidence of a novel homomeric TAPL interaction and demonstrate that the DHFR PCA will be of general utility in studies of half ABC transporter interactions in vivo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".