MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1997096528 · doi:10.1021/bi0491245

Detection of TAP Family Dimerizations by an<i>in Vivo</i>Assay in Mammalian Cells

2004· article· en· W1997096528 on OpenAlexaff
Dennis B. Leveson-Gower, Stephen W. Michnick, Victor Ling

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransporter associated with antigen processingProtein-fragment complementation assayATP-binding cassette transporterIn vivoTransporterChinese hamster ovary cellComplementationBiologyBiochemistryCell biologyMolecular biologyChemistryIn vitroGeneAntigen presentationGeneticsPhenotypeReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The transporter associated with antigen presentation (TAP) is an ATP-binding cassette (ABC) protein which transports peptides for presentation to the immune system. TAP is composed of two half transporters, TAP1 (ABCB2) and TAP2 (ABCB3), which heterodimerize to function. In humans, the TAP family consists of TAP1, TAP2, and TAPL (ABCB9). While the TAP1-TAP2 complex is well characterized, TAPL's dimerization state and function are unknown. To identify interactions within the human TAP family, we adapted the dihydrofolate reductase protein-fragment complementation assay (DHFR PCA) to half ABC transporters. This assay has been shown to be suitable for the study of membrane-bound proteins in vivo [Remy, I., Wilson, I. A., and Michnick, S. W. (1999) Science 283, 990-993]. With this method, in vivo TAP1-TAP2 heterodimerization was confirmed, no homodimerizations were detected with TAP1 or TAP2, and TAPL did not show any interaction with TAP1 or TAP2. However, we found strong evidence that TAPL forms homodimers. These results provide evidence of a novel homomeric TAPL interaction and demonstrate that the DHFR PCA will be of general utility in studies of half ABC transporter interactions in vivo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.383

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistrySame topicDrug Transport and Resistance MechanismsFrench-language works237,207