MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1997147307 · doi:10.1109/glocomw.2011.6162366

Cost-Aware Smart Microgrid Network design for a sustainable smart grid

2011· article· en· W1997147307 on OpenAlexaff
Melike Erol‐Kantarci, Burak Kantarcı, Hussein T. Mouftah

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrogridSmart gridComputer scienceRenewable energyDistributed computingInteger programmingGridEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Smart MicroGrids (SMGs) are expected to be a significant ingredient of the future smart grid as they simplify the integration of distributed renewable energy generation units, offer reliable service, provide faster restoration capabilities and support sustainable grid operation. Furthermore, by the help of the Information and Communication Technologies (ICT), energy management systems of the SMGs can communicate with each other and provide a platform where microgrids can export or import power, provided that certain power quality constraints and standards are met. These virtually connected microgrids form the Smart Microgrid Network (SMGN). In this paper, we propose the Cost-Aware Smart Microgrid Network (CoS-MoNet) design scheme that enables economic power transactions within the SMGN. CoSMoNet is based on an Integer Linear Programming (ILP) formulation that matches the excess energy in the storage banks of a group of SMGs to the demands of other SMGs whose load cannot be accommodated by their local supply. Our results show that CoSMoNet enables cost-efficient power transactions among microgrid communities, increases the utilization of renewable energy, reduces the dependency of the microgrids to the utility grid, and consequently reduces the load on the grid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207