MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1997166885 · doi:10.1139/y00-111

Spread of Ca<sup>2+</sup>in the sarcomere during fast and slow activation of mammalian cardiac myocytes

2001· article· en· W1997166885 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Masato Konishi, Yoichiro Kusakari, Satoshi Kurihara

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSarcomereEndoplasmic reticulumBiophysicsMyocyteTroponinChemistryCardiac muscleCalciumAnatomyInternal medicineBiochemistryBiologyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A multi-compartment model was used to estimate Ca2+ gradients in a sarcomere of a cardiac myocyte. The mathematical model assumed Ca2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum as a driving function, and calculated Ca2+ binding to myoplasmic buffers, Ca2+ uptake by the sarcoplasmic reticulum, and diffusion of Ca2+ (and the buffers). During the fast Ca2+ transient similar to those observed during a twitch, the model predicted a large Ca2+ gradient in the sarcomere. A trajectory of the instantaneous relation between spatially averaged concentrations of Ca2+ and the Ca2+-troponin complex showed a counterclockwise loop, indicating non-equilibrium Ca2+ binding to troponin. During slow changes in [Ca2+] with time to peaks of approximately 500 ms or longer, the gradient of [Ca2+] was largely dissipated and the apparent equilibrium of the Ca2+-troponin binding reaction was suggested with little hysteresis of the trajectory. We conclude that a steady-state relation between [Ca2+] and mechanical activity can be achieved uniformly in the sarcomere by slowing the rate of Ca2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology→Same topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias→French-language works237,207→