A study on VOC source and sink behavior in porous building materials - analytical model development and assessment
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Building materials can strongly affect indoor air quality. Porous building materials are not only sources of indoor air pollutants such as volatile organic compounds (VOC) but they are also strong sinks of these pollutants. The knowledge of VOC transfer mechanisms in these materials is an important step for controlling the indoor VOC concentration levels, and for determining the optimum ventilation requirements for acceptable IAQ. This study provides a theoretical investigation of primary and secondary VOC source and sink behavior of porous building materials. A new analytical model was developed based on the fundamental theories of mass transfer mechanisms in porous materials. The proposed model considers both primary and secondary source/sink behavior for the first time. The former refers to the transfer of gas-phase and/or physically adsorbed VOC, while the latter refers to the generation or elimination of VOC within the solid because of chemical reactions like oxidation, hydrolysis, chemical adsorption, etc. The proposed model was assessed with experimental data, namely emission tests of carpets and sorption tests of wood chipboard. It was demonstrated that, unlike the existing analytical models, the proposed analytical model could simultaneously account for the effect of air velocity on both VOC source as well as sink behavior. Case studies were then carried out for secondary VOC source behavior. Due to the lack of experimental studies on mechanisms of secondary behavior, hypothetical generation functions were implemented. It was demonstrated that the proposed analytical model is suitable for describing various mechanisms involved in the secondary behavior due to the little limitations imposed on the generation/elimination term. When VOC generation takes place at the material-air interface, the simulation shows that although the primary emission is not affected by air velocity, the secondary emission, however, is clearly affected. This behavior agrees with the available experimental findings on secondary emissions. PRACTICAL IMPLICATION: The analytical model presented in this paper can predict both primary and secondary VOC source (emission) or sink (sorption) behavior of porous building materials. Since the model considers diffusion and adsorption/desorption within the material, and convection over the material surface, the simulation using the model can readily provide the effects of material properties and airflow properties on the primary and/or the secondary behavior, hence, it can provide a better understanding on the mechanisms. This will enable us to keep the indoor VOC concentration within a desirable level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it