Identification of novel<i>FUS</i>mutations in sporadic cases of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mutations in the FUS gene have been recently associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). While most of the variants have been identified in patients with a family history of the disease, a few mutations were also found in sporadic patients. Considering this, we wanted to evaluate the frequency of mutations in the coding region of the FUS gene in a sporadic ALS (SALS) cohort compared to a control population. We tested 475 SALS cases of European origin and 475 matched controls for coding variations in the 15 exons of the FUS gene. Rare novel variants were identified in a total of five SALS patients: one missense, one deletion, one frameshift, and one nonsense substitution. Two of the four variants are located in the carboxy terminal of the protein where the previously reported variants were mostly clustered. In conclusion, FUS gene mutations are rare in SALS, with four new FUS variants identified in five different SALS cases. These findings will help evaluate the proportion of FUS variations in the SALS population, and to better understand its contributing role to ALS pathology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".