Influence of Reduced Feed Ration on <i>Lepeophtheirus salmonis</i> Infestation and Inflammatory Gene Expression in Juvenile Pink Salmon
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of reduced feed ration on infestation levels with the sea louse Lepeophtheirus salmonis and gene expression in juvenile pink salmon Oncorhynchus gorbuscha was tested in three laboratory trials. Body weight was significantly lower among fish on the reduced ration for 27, 34, or 65 d than fish on the full ration. Neither the prevalence nor the abundance of L. salmonis differed between fish on full and reduced rations at any time in any trial. In trial 2, sea louse rejection was delayed among fish on reduced rations; however, the parasite was ultimately rejected from all fish in this trial regardless of ration. Proinflammatory gene expression in salmon exposed to L. salmonis was modulated by reduced rations. There was a reduction in the expression of interleukin-8 in pink salmon on reduced rations 7 d after exposure but not 14 d after exposure. In contrast, the 7-d expression of interleukin-1 beta (IL-1beta) was reduced in exposed pink salmon regardless of ration. By day 14, however, expression of IL-1beta was increased in association with reduced rations among exposed salmon. Similarly, the expression of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) was increased 14 d after exposure among salmon on a reduced ration. There was no evidence that short-duration exposure of otherwise healthy juvenile pink salmon to a reduced ration affected susceptibility to L. salmonis. The expression data do not suggest an obvious mechanism of louse rejection; rather, they indicate that a more comprehensive suite of inflammatory pathways should be surveyed to better understand the early pink salmon response to L. salmonis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".