Interaction of Staufen1 with the 5' end of mRNA facilitates translation of these RNAs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Staufen1 is a component of transported ribonucleoprotein complexes. Genetic work in Drosophila has suggested that Staufen plays a role in the de-repression of translation of oskar mRNA following localization. To determine whether Staufen1 can play a similar role in mammals, we studied translation of transcripts in the presence or in the absence of Staufen1. Translationally repressed mRNAs were generated by fusing the structured human immunodeficiency virus type 1 trans-activating response (TAR) element to the 5' end of a reporter transcript. In rabbit reticulocyte lysates and in mammalian cultured cells, the addition of Staufen1 resulted in the up-regulation of reporter activity when translation was driven by the TAR-bearing RNA. In contrast, Staufen1 had no effect on translation of efficiently translated mRNAs lacking an apparent structured 5' end, suggesting that Staufen1-binding to the 5' end is required for enhanced translation. Consistently, Staufen1 RNA-binding activity is necessary for this translational effect. In addition, similar up-regulation of translation was observed when Staufen1 was tethered to the 5' end of mRNAs via other structured RNAs, the highest level of translational increase being obtained with the bona fide Staufen1-binding site of the Arf1 transcript. The expression of Staufen1 promoted polysomal loading of TAR-luciferase transcripts resulting in enhanced translation. Our results support a model in which the expression of Staufen1 and its interaction with the 5' end of RNA and ribosomes facilitate translation initiation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".