Pathogenesis of Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome: Gut Origin, Protection, and Decontamination
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Clinical and experimental studies performed over the past several decades have implicated bacterial and endotoxin translocation (BET) from the gut to distant organs in the pathogenesis of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). Experimental studies in animals directed at maintaining the integrity of the intestinal mucosa have shown efficacy in preventing BET and the induction of distant inflammatory processes, suggesting that the egress of bacteria and their surface endotoxins might be pivotal in inducing MODS. However, clinical studies have failed to convincingly recapitulate these beneficial effects. Selective digestive decontamination, although it effectively decreases rates of respiratory infection, has failed to reduce MODS in critically ill patients and, except in certain patient subsets, has had no demonstrable effect on mortality. Nevertheless, the gut is an immunologically active organ that, irrespective of BET occurrence, appears to contribute significantly to the development of distant organ dysfunction following ischemia/reperfusion injury. Resuscitation strategies aimed at minimizing the inflammatory effects of gut-derived mediators, such as toxic oxygen species, appear promising in preventing the development of distant organ injury in the critically ill patient.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".