MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1997414003 · doi:10.1017/s0317167100006089

Neurocardiogenic Syncope: Frequency and Consequences of its Misdiagnosis as Epilepsy

2007· article· en· W1997414003 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Colin B. Josephson, Susan R. Rahey, R. Mark Sadler

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityNova Scotia Health AuthorityCapital District Health Authority
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEpilepsyPediatricsReferralSyncope (phonology)Work-upRetrospective cohort studyPsychiatrySurgeryInternal medicineFamily medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Neurocardiogenic syncope (NCS) can be mistaken as a seizure. We reviewed the frequency and diagnostic consequences of this misdiagnosis. METHODS: A retrospective review of outpatient adult epilepsy clinic charts (QEII Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, NS) was conducted to identify NCS patients referred with a provisional diagnosis of seizures. Charts were reviewed in detail with an emphasis on the consequences of misdiagnosis. RESULTS: Of 1506 consecutive referrals to the epilepsy clinic, 194 (12.9%) ultimately had a clinical diagnosis of NCS. Mean age was 38 +/- 16 years (mean age of syncopal onset was 28 +/- 16 years). Two-thirds of referrals were from primary care physicians (including emergency departments) and 18% from neurologists. Thirty-five percent were prescribed antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) prior to referral with eight patients (4.1%) experiencing hypersensitivity reactions. Three of five women had adverse pregnancy outcomes while taking AEDs. One-third of patients had restrictions placed on their driving privileges while 11 patients (5.7%) had their employment interrupted. Diagnostic modalities used in the work-up included EEG (90%), CT head (51%), and MRI head (15%). CONCLUSIONS: NCS is commonly misdiagnosed as epilepsy. Some patients had an incorrect diagnosis for > 10 years. Patients with this misdiagnosis are often excessively investigated, inappropriately treated, and have unnecessary restrictions placed on driving and employment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2007
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences NeurologiquesSame topicCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersFrench-language works237,207