Marked Variation in Free Radical Injury Between Bovine and Porcine Endothelial Cells Cultured in Different Media
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previous studies produced models of oxygen-derived free radical (OFR) injury, using H(2)O(2) or xanthine/xanthine oxidase (X/XO), in cultured porcine aortic endothelium (PAE) and rat coronary endothelium. H(2)O(2) at 0.1 mM resulted in 50% viability in both cell types. To determine if comparable H(2)O(2) or X/XO concentrations have the same injurious effect on endothelium from other sources, models of OFR injury were developed for bovine aortic endothelium (BAE) and bovine brain microvessel endothelium (BBME). Varying concentrations of H(2)O(2) (0.01 to 6 mM) or X/XO (10 microM/0.1 to 0.3 U/mL) were added to medium 24 h prior to evaluating cell damage. Injury was assessed using the Trypan blue exclusion test (% viability) and by measuring the release of lactate dehydrogenase into medium. H(2)O(2) concentrations required to produce 50% viability were >6 mM in BAE and BBME versus 1 mM in PAE when cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM). Similarly, BAE and BBME were less sensitive than PAE to damage by X/XO. Cells from both species were more sensitive to H(2)O(2) or X/XO injury when grown in Medium 199 (M199) versus DMEM. The most profound difference was observed with PAE where 50% viability was obtained with 0.12 versus 1.05 mM H(2)O(2) in M199 versus DMEM. These results indicate that bovine endothelial cells from aorta and brain are more resistant to free radical injury than PAE. The presence or absence of key media components (iron, pyruvate, cysteine, histidine) likely influences the extent of OFR injury.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".