Neuroprotection following Fluid Percussion Brain Trauma: A Pilot Study Using Quercetin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previously, we were able to demonstrate the neuroprotective effect of quercetin in an animal model of acute traumatic spinal cord injury. The objective of the present study was to determine whether any neuroprotective effect is seen when quercetin is administered in an animal model of traumatic brain injury. Twenty-six adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were submitted to moderate fluid percussion injury in the anterior midline position. Animals were divided into two experimental groups: one group received 25 mumol/kg quercetin starting 1 h after injury, while animals in the second group received saline vehicle (n = 13 per group). Eight animals were used as uninjured healthy controls. Eight animals in each experimental group were sacrificed at 24 h, while five animals per group were allowed to recover for 72 h following injury. Compound action potential amplitudes (CAPAs) were recorded on 400-microm vibrotome sections of the corpus callosum superfused with oxygenated artificial CSF (n = 3 per animal) in 20 experimental animals and five healthy controls. Three brains from animals in each experimental group and healthy controls were used for histological, immunocytochemical and biochemical analysis after sacrifice at 24 h. CAPAs in uninjured animals had a mean of 1.12 mV. This decreased to 0.55 mV in saline vehicle-treated injured animals by 24 h and changed little over the next 3 days. CAPAs were significantly better at 0.82 mV at 24 h and 0.76 mV at 3 days in quercetin-treated injured animals when compared to injured saline vehicle controls. Quercetin significantly prevented decrease of glutathione levels and decreased myeloperoxidase activity. We conclude that this dietary flavonoid has therapeutic potential following brain trauma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".