MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1997504848 · doi:10.1063/1.1748862

Three-layer photocarrier radiometry model of ion-implanted silicon wafers

2004· article· en· W1997504848 on OpenAlexaff
Bincheng Li, Derrick Shaughnessy, Andreas Mandelis, Jerias Batista, José Ángel García García

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermography and Photoacoustic Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIon implantationWaferMaterials scienceSemiconductorIonSiliconLayer (electronics)OptoelectronicsOpticsChemistryNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A three-dimensional three-layer model is presented for the quantitative understanding of the infrared photocarrier radiometry (PCR) response of ion-implanted semiconductors, specifically Si. In addition to the implanted layer and intact substrate normally assumed in all existing two-layer theoretical models to describe the photothermal response of ion-implanted semiconductors, a surface layer is considered in this three-layer model to represent a thin, less severally damaged region close to the surface. The effects on the PCR signal of several structural, transport, and optical properties of ion-implanted silicon wafers affected significantly by the ion implantation process (minority carrier lifetime, diffusion coefficient, optical absorption coefficient, thickness of the implanted layer, and front surface recombination velocity) are discussed. The dependence of the PCR signal on the ion implantation dose is theoretically calculated and compared to experimental results. Good agreement between experimental data and theoretical calculations is obtained. Both theoretical and experimental results show the PCR dependence on dose can be separated into four regions with the transition across each region defined by the implantation-induced electrical and optical degrees of damage, respectively, as the electrical and optical damage occurs at different dose ranges. It is also shown that the PCR amplitude decreases monotonically with increasing implantation dose. This monotonic dependence provides the potential of the PCR technique for industrial applications in semiconductor metrology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicThermography and Photoacoustic TechniquesFrench-language works237,207