Visual Outcome and Rehabilitation in a Case of Bilateral Acanthamoeba Sclerokeratitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To report a rare and complicated case of bilateral Acanthamoeba sclerokeratitis (ASK). METHODS: Case report of a 42-year-old patient who was referred to the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary 7 months after a history of culture-confirmed bilateral Acanthamoeba polyphaga sclerokeratitis. At the time of referral to the MEEI, he was noted to have iris neovascularization and chronic mydriasis in both eyes. The anterior chambers were shallow, and there were mature cortical cataracts that obscured the posterior pole in both eyes. His visual acuity in both eyes was limited to hand motions. RESULTS: The patient underwent sequential cataract extraction, penetrating keratoplasty (PK), and yttrium-argon-garnet laser capsulotomy of the right eye over a span of 3 months. This treatment substantially improved the vision in his right eye to 20/400. Cataract extraction surgery and a PK have been scheduled for this patient's left eye in the near future. CONCLUSIONS: Some patients with ASK and apparently poor visual prognosis can achieve substantial visual improvement after anterior-segment surgery. This report describes the management and outcome of only the second reported case of bilateral ASK in the world.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".