Correction for Triples in Reduced Multireference Coupled-Cluster Approaches
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The performance of the recently proposed version of the reduced multireference (RMR) coupled-cluster (CC) method with singles and doubles (SD), which employs a modest-size configuration interaction wave function as an external source for a small subset of approximate connected three- and four-body cluster amplitudes that are primarily responsible for the nondynamic correlation effects, and which has been perturbatively corrected for the remaining triples along the same line as in the standard CCSD(T) method (Li X., Paldus J.: J. Chem. Phys. 2006 , 124 , 174101), referred to by the acronym RMR CCSD(T), is being tested by evaluating equilibrium spectroscopic constants for a demanding system of the beryllium dimer, as well as by computing atomization energies for several di- and triatomics. The focus is on the equilibrium properties, since it has been demonstrated earlier that the RMR CCSD method corrects well for the nondynamic correlation in bond-breaking situations. We find that in all the cases we have examined, the RMR CCSD(T) method does in fact improve the performance of CCSD(T) even in the vicinity of the equilibrium geometry. For states possessing a moderate multireference character, the improvement in computed thermochemical properties relative to CCSD(T) amounts to a few kJ/mol, a meaningful amount when striving for chemical accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it