Serving Children with HIV/AIDS in Canadian Public Schools: An Interpretation of the CPA Guidelines for Non-Discriminatory Practice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As a result of recent advances in HIVIAIDS treatments, the near future will bring a significantly increased number of children either infected with - or affected by - HIV/AIDS into public schools in Canada. In order to help the psychologist and other professionals involved in the education of children, we have interpreted the Canadian Psychological Association (CPA) Guidelines for Non-Discriminatory Practice in this context. As with the Canadian Code of Ethics for Psychologists (CPA, 1991) the general principles of the Guidelines for Non-Discriminatory Practice include: I. Respect for the Dignity of Persons, II. Responsible Caring, III. Integrity in Relationships, and IV Responsibility to Society. In addition, we have included practical vignettes in the hope of stimulating continued dialogue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.023 | 0.052 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.032 | 0.032 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.012 | 0.018 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".