Detailed Dissection of a New Mechanism for Glycoside Cleavage: α-1,4-Glucan Lyase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The unusual enzyme, Gracilariopsis alpha-1,4-glucan lyase of the sequence-related glycoside hydrolase family 31, cleaves the glycosidic bond of alpha-1,4-glucans via a beta-elimination reaction involving a covalent glycosyl-enzyme intermediate (Lee, S. S., Yu, S., and Withers, S. G. (2002) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 4948-4949). The classical bell-shaped pH dependence of k(cat)/K(m) indicates two ionizable groups in the active site with apparent pK(a) values of 3.05 and 6.66. Brønsted relationships of log k(cat) versus pK(a) and log(k(cat)/K(m)) versus pK(a) for a series of aryl glucosides both show a linear monotonic dependence on leaving group pK(a) with low beta(lg) values of 0.32 and 0.33, respectively. The combination of these low beta(lg) values with large secondary deuterium kinetic isotope effects (k(H)/k(D) = 1.16 - 1.19) on the first step indicate a glycosylation step with substantial glycosidic bond cleavage and proton donation to the leaving group oxygen at the transition state. Developed oxocarbenium ion character of the transition state is also suggested by the potent inhibition afforded by acarbose and 1-deoxynojirimycin (K(i) = 20 and 130 nM, respectively) and by the substantial rate reduction afforded by adjacent fluorine substitution. For only one substrate, 5-fluoro-alpha-D-glucopyranosyl fluoride, was the second elimination step shown to be rate-limiting. The large alpha-secondary deuterium kinetic isotope effect (k(H)/k(D) = 1.23) at C-1 and the small primary deuterium kinetic isotope effect (k(H)/k(D) = 1.92) at C-2 confirm an E2 mechanism with strong E1 character for this second step. This considerable structural and mechanistic similarity with retaining alpha-glucosidases is clear evidence for the evolution of an enzyme mechanism within the family.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".