MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1997763641 · doi:10.1002/qua.560140813

Studies of the energy density functional approach. I. Kinetic energy

2009· article· en· W1997763641 on OpenAlexaff
Y. Tal, R. F. W. Bader

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Quantum Chemistry · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKinetic energyOrbital-free density functional theoryQuantumDensity functional theoryCharge densityRange (aeronautics)Hartree–Fock methodAtom (system on chip)Hybrid functionalLimitingChemistryCharge (physics)Limit (mathematics)Basis (linear algebra)Local-density approximationAtomic physicsStatistical physicsPhysicsQuantum mechanicsMaterials scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The quantum kinetic energy density is defined and its properties discussed. Its limiting values, at the nucleus of an atom and at large distances from it, are both shown to be proportional to the corresponding values of the charge density. The properties of existing kinetic energy density functionals are analyzed with respect to their local behavior and compared with the quantum results at the Hartree-Fock level. Their local behavior is found to be unsatisfactory. It is shown that the higher-order terms in the general gradient expansion, which may be considered as the basis for these models, diverge in the long-range limit. In view of these findings, a model of the kinetic energy density functional is proposed which possesses the correct limiting values for an exact as well as for a Hartree-Fock charge density. Its local behavior is found to be in good agreement with the quantum results. Thus, the integrated values of this kinetic energy density functional are in excellent general agreement with Hartree-Fock values, the percentage error in the estimate for argon, for example, being 0.04%. The basis for this model is a partitioning of the charge density into corelike and valence components. The charge density itself is not modeled, as the proposed partitioning scheme may be applied to any density, including the exact one. Consequently, the present model should be useful in the energy density functional approach to the study of the physical properties of atoms, molecules, and solids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Quantum ChemistrySame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207