Bibliographic record
Abstract
Buildings talk," noted California-based healthcare architect Don McKahan at the 2000 annual conference of the Planetree Alliance.If so, what do our hospital buildings have to say about the relationship between the healthcare system and the surrounding community and the environment?Are we conveying the right message?After all, the way in which a hospital is designed and constructed can have significant implications for the environmental impact of healthcare for decades into the future, affecting the health of the environment and the people who live in it, not just locally, but globally.For years there has been an interest in the residential, commercial and municipal sectors in "green architecture."This is an approach that seeks to minimize the environmental and health impacts of the built environment in which we spend 80 to 90% of our time.Now healthcare architects are turning their attention to green design for hospitals.• In Canada, the Canadian Coalition for Green Healthcare is developing a "green hospital building checklist"that addresses a wide range of issues.The Coalition plans to publish this checklist, and put it on its website (www.greenhealthcare.ca)prior to the 2002 OHA Convention in November.At the convention, one-half of the Coalition's educational session will be devoted to the topic of green healthcare architecture, while several of the case studies in the Coalition's "Greening Healthcare"publication (available from the resources section of the website) feature some aspect of green healthcare architecture.Canadian healthcare architects have also begun to address this issue.The 2001 conference of the Ontario Association of Architects included a session on green healthcare architecture, while the Fall 2000/Winter 2001 edition of the Royal Architectural Institute of Canada's Wastenot newsletter (www.raic.org/wastenot)featured the healthcare system.• In the United States, the American Society for Healthcare Engineering (part of the American Hospital Association), in conjunction with the American Institute of Architects' Academy of Architecture for Health, has just introduced a Sustainable Design Award.This award will "recognize healthcare sector design professionals and facilities that have completed projects in the area of green design and construction."Applicantsfor the award will be judged on their efforts in the areas of healthy indoor environments; reducing emissions of greenhouse gases, toxic substances and substances that reduce the stratospheric ozone layer; minimizing the depletion of natural resources and reducing consumption of energy and water.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.064 | 0.017 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".