MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1997779306 · doi:10.3747/co.19.850

A Call for Action in Survivorship Research and Care

2012· article· en· W1997779306 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Richard Doll, Arminée Kazanjian, Kirsten Smillie, Amanda Ward, Martin Chasen

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Oncology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicOptimism, Hope, and Well-being
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCall to actionSurvivorship curveAction (physics)CancerInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The term “cancer survivor” has been used to convey various meanings over time. [...]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.339
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.240
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.339
Threshold uncertainty score0.816

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.3390.240
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.008
Bibliometrics0.0070.005
Science and technology studies0.0250.100
Scholarly communication0.0370.070
Open science0.0130.041
Research integrity0.0960.179
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.496
GPT teacher head0.576
Teacher spread0.079 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent OncologySame topicOptimism, Hope, and Well-beingFrench-language works237,207