Rapid determination of oxidative stability of edible oils by FTIR spectroscopy using disposable IR cards
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Disposable polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) polymer IR (PIR) cards were used as substrates to rapidly oxidize edible oils and simultaneously monitor the extent of oxidation by FTIR spectroscopy. Four edible oils were oxidized on PIR cards and in bulk at moderate temperature (58°C), and real‐time oxidation plots were obtained by measuring changes in the IR hydroperoxide (ROOH) absorbance as a function of time. The relationship between the ROOH absorbance and PV was developed using a reference method to define absorbances corresponding to PV end points of 100 and 200 meq ROOH/kg for the oils oxidized in bulk and on cards, respectively. The real‐time oxidation plots obtained for the oils oxidized in bulk and on cards were similar in appearance, but the oils on the cards reached the PV end point 20 times faster than the oils oxidized in bulk. The results indicate that the use of disposable PIR cards coupled with moderate heating and aeration provides a simple, practical, and rapid means for monitoring oxidation and determining the oxidative stability of edible oils at a normal storage temperature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".