MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1997842416 · doi:10.1007/s11205-010-9588-5

Surveying Older Adults’ Opinions on Housing: Recommendations for Policy

2010· article· en· W1997842416 on OpenAlexaff
Shannon L. Wagner, Mamdouh M. Shubair, Alex C. Michalos

Bibliographic record

VenueSocial Indicators Research · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAccommodationHousing tenureHuman geographyAffordable housingPublic housingPopulationBusinessPublic healthGerontologyEnvironmental healthMedicinePsychologyEconomic growthNursingPolitical scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.198
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.394
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.198
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1980.394
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.007
Bibliometrics0.0090.020
Science and technology studies0.0080.006
Scholarly communication0.0170.017
Open science0.0140.007
Research integrity0.0170.015
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.206
GPT teacher head0.576
Teacher spread0.370 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueSocial Indicators ResearchSame topicGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesFrench-language works237,207