MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1997872425 · doi:10.1118/1.2244665

Po‐Thur Eve General‐38: The Virtual Radiotherapy Department

2006· article· en· W1997872425 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Brian C. Murray, Brian Chwyl, Kendall M. Campbell, S Connors, G. Dundas, Shannon Eberle, Susan Fawcett, C. Field, Susan Richardson, David G. Sandahl, Martijn Schouten, C. Yakimovich

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadiation TherapistRadiation oncologyRadiation treatment planningMedical educationService (business)Radiation therapyMedical physicsComputer scienceMedicineRadiologyBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the number of clinical cases increasing each year, there is pressure on all clinical staff to do more clinical service. At the same time there is a demand to train more students in all of the radiotherapy disciplines. Regulatory agencies are also demanding more continuing education and upgrading for existing staff. We have recently introduced a new clinical treatment planning system, which requires a significant amount of training for all staff members. To meet these increased demands for training all levels of learners we have developed a “Virtual Radiotherapy Department”. The Virtual Radiotherapy Department will provide on line teaching of basic physics and treatment planning for radiation therapy students, radiation oncology residents, and physics graduate students and residents. By using on‐line interactive tools it is possible to teach all the different students at different levels by making basic information available to all students, but linking to more advanced information for those that require it. On‐line videos have been created describing several clinical techniques using various equipment. These videos will be used to provide students instruction as well as for continuing education for existing staff or new staff. These tools will be used to provide training to all users as we introduce our new treatment planning system, showing them exactly how to complete various tasks. These videos are customized to our treatment processes; therefore, they show users exactly what is required in the most efficient manner. Funding Provided by Alberta Health and Wellness and Varian.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.253
Threshold uncertainty score0.847

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2530.045

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Physics→Same topicAdvances in Oncology and Radiotherapy→French-language works237,207→