Bibliographic record
Abstract
Travelers infected with measles in Canada were grounded due to measles.1 Air carriers are no longer willing to transport potential risk persons, as it may result in litigation or similar situation as described in this issue.2,3 The recently introduced World Health Organization (WHO) International Health Regulations 4 may result in some limitations to personal freedom in favor of public security. Quarantine still is an effective weapon in controlling a threat to public health—whereas freedom is a recent achievement of democracy and not historic. Persons who are noncompliant with official health requirements constitute a danger to health safety and may cause costly interventions. Tracing the origin of avoidable disease has become easier and therefore the person responsible for transmitting an infectious disease may be detected. Protecting against infection is a balancing act between public good and personal freedom. Should responsible individuals have to pay for an outbreak? When an epidemic of physical disease starts to spread, the community approves and joins in a quarantine of the patients in order to protect health of the community against the spread of the disease (Franklin D. Roosevelt, Speech at Chicago, October 5, 1937). In May 2007, 42 Japanese tourists among a group of 130 were denied the right to fly back from Canada … Corresponding Author: Maia Funk, MD, Centre of Travel Health, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Zurich, Hirschengraben 84, CH‐8001 Zurich, Switzerland. E‐mail: sethi{at}ifspm.uzh.ch
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.037 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".