O2-S1.06 Community responses to an HIV epidemic in South India: knowledge, moral panic and cultural inertia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Studies have shown that as communities face serious threats to traditional values, such as that posed by HIV, cultural inertia may result, whereby existing trends towards more liberalised views of sexuality are stalled, particularly among the educated and youth. We examined changes in attitudes around HIV in Bagalkot district, south India, between 2003 and 2009. Methods General population surveys were conducted in 2003 and 2009, among approximately 6600 randomly sampled men and women in 10 villages and 20 urban blocks. Questions about HIV knowledge, sexuality, gender and condoms were included. Results Knowledge of HIV increased from 77% in 2003 to 88% in 2009, and condom awareness increased significantly (37.4%–65.4%). However, in 2009, only 23% of people mentioned condoms spontaneously as a means of preventing transmission (an increase from 8% in 2003). There was an increase in those who thought sex workers should be compulsorily tested for HIV (63.0% vs 73.5%, p=0.01). An increasing number of people agreed that it is wrong to talk about sex" (24.2% vs 29.2%, p=0.05), especially women (21.9% vs 32.4%, p<0.01). There was an increase in those who thought it “wrong to talk about AIDS in a respectable family” (16.4% vs 0.22.1%, p=0.01), largely among urban women, youth and the more educated, and more in 2009 thought it improper for respectable people to discuss condoms (5.5% vs 17.9%, p<0.01). In 2003, 11.8% agreed that “access to condoms promotes promiscuity”, increasing to 29.5% in 2009 (p<0.01). Men, educated people, urbanites and young people under 25 were the most likely to believe this. Sex education was thought to be equally damaging, especially among women and young people, with more agreeing that it promotes sexual activity and promiscuity in 2009 than in 2003 (19.3% vs 30.2%, p<0.01). Conclusions Although scapegoats (in the form of sex workers) were increasingly identified by the community, stigma towards those with HIV appeared to have reduced significantly. Despite increased knowledge and positive changes around stigma, fear of change to cultural mores was apparent, with unwillingness to embrace openness and discuss sexuality. Young and educated respondents appeared to be the most regressive thinkers, reflecting a cultural inertia that mirrors studies of other threats to traditional societal values. More effort is required to educate young people about healthy sexuality, openness and safe sex.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".