Rapid, accurate calculation of the <i>s</i>-wave scattering length
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transformation of the conventional radial Schrödinger equation defined on the interval r ∈ [0, ∞) into an equivalent form defined on the finite domain y(r) ∈ [a, b] allows the s-wave scattering length a(s) to be exactly expressed in terms of a logarithmic derivative of the transformed wave function φ(y) at the outer boundary point y = b, which corresponds to r = ∞. In particular, for an arbitrary interaction potential that dies off as fast as 1/r(n) for n ≥ 4, the modified wave function φ(y) obtained by using the two-parameter mapping function r(y; ̄r,β) = ̄r[1 + 1/β tan(πy/2)] has no singularities, and a(s) = ̄r[1 + 2/πβ 1/φ(1) dφ(1)/dy]. For a well bound potential with equilibrium distance r(e), the optimal mapping parameters are ̄r ≈ r(e) and β ≈ n/2 - 1. An outward integration procedure based on Johnson's log-derivative algorithm [J. Comp. Phys. 13, 445 (1973)] combined with a Richardson extrapolation procedure is shown to readily yield high precision a(s)-values both for model Lennard-Jones (2n, n) potentials and for realistic published potentials for the Xe-e(-), Cs(2)(aΣ(u)(+)(3)), and (3, 4)He(2)(XΣ(g)(+)(1)) systems. Use of this same transformed Schrödinger equation was previously shown [V. V. Meshkov et al., Phys. Rev. A 78, 052510 (2008)] to ensure the efficient calculation of all bound levels supported by a potential, including those lying extremely close to dissociation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".