Donor-Site Morbidity of the Inferior Gluteal Musculocutaneous Flap for Breast Reconstruction in Teenagers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Brief The purpose of this study is to objectively evaluate donor-site morbidity of the inferior gluteal musculocutaneous flap in teenagers. All cases of breast reconstruction performed between 1996 and 2005 using an inferior gluteal flap were reviewed. Flap size, weight, and pedicle origin were noted. Donor-site morbidity was assessed for scarring, contour deformity, muscle function, and sensation. The charts of 15 patients were reviewed, and 6 patients were available for further investigation. The average flap size and weight were 17 cm × 7 cm and 430 g, respectively. All patients had a well-concealed scar with minimal buttock asymmetry. Sensory assessment showed some degree of hypoesthesia in the territory of the posterior femoral cutaneous nerve in all patients. There was no functional loss. Donor-site morbidity of the inferior gluteal musculocutaneous flap is largely related to posterior thigh hypoesthesia despite preservation of the posterior femoral cutaneous nerve. All 15 teenagers with inferior gluteal flap breast reconstruction were found to have some hypesthesia of the posterior femoral cutaneous nerve territory but no other functional loss.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".