Reactions of low molecular weight highly functionalized maleic anhydride grafted polyethylene with polyetherdiamines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Reaction between low molecular weight highly functionalized maleic anhydride grafted polyethylene and several diamines were carried out using xylene as a reaction media. The influence of varying the amine to maleic anhydride (NH2/MAH) molar ratio and chain length of diamine on reaction was investigated. It was shown that the reactions of these materials cannot be followed by FTIR measurements alone. In these examples, colorimetric titrations were used to assess residual acid/anhydride content that was not detected by FTIR. The reaction between anhydride and amine was observed to be fast. The degree of reaction and crosslinking in the reactor was observed to depend on the concentration of the reaction mixture and the NH2/MAH molar ratio. In some cases, a gelatinous insoluble mass was produced in the reactor and this material was not easily processed for further characterization. All soluble reaction products obtained were observed to be thermoplastic and could be melt processed at elevated temperatures. However, further reaction and crosslinking of these materials occurred during processing to produce thermosets, as demonstrated by rheological measurements and sintering experiments. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".