MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998286297 · doi:10.1139/p08-091

Theoretical spin-orbit structure of the alkali dimer cation K<sub>2</sub>+

2008· article· en· W1998286297 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
A. Jraij, A. Allouche, S. Magnier, M. Aubert-Frécon

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgence Universitaire de la Francophonie
KeywordsPhysicsAtomic physicsDipolePotential energyOrbit (dynamics)Energy (signal processing)Alkali metalSpin (aerodynamics)Range (aeronautics)Quantum mechanicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A theoretical study of the electronic structure of [Formula: see text] including spin-orbit effects has been performed. Potential energy curves for the 58 molecular states in the representation Ωg,u are presented. Equilibrium distances, transition energies, depths for wells, and heights for humps predicted at short and large range of internuclear distances R are reported for all the bound states [Formula: see text] and Ωg,u dissociating to limits up to K++K(6p 2P3/2). Transition dipole moments have been calculated for all the allowed transitions among states [Formula: see text] dissociating to limits up to K+ +K(3d 2D). To the best of our knowledge, these are the first data reported for the Ωg,u states of [Formula: see text]. Extensive tables of energy values and transition dipole moments versus internuclear distances are available at the web address: http://www-lasim.univ-lyon1.fr/spip.php?rubrique99.PACS Nos.: 31.10.+z, 31.15.A–, 31.15.aj

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207