Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Floating ladder rail tracks, which can significantly reduce traffic vibration and noise, have already been installed at several railway sites in and around Tokyo. The steel rails are fixed onto successive ladder‐like sections with two parallel longitudinal reinforced concrete sleepers, which are then mounted upon discrete resilient supports on a concrete bed. A simple mathematical model in which a continuous horizontal Bernoulli–Euler beam on periodic discrete elastic supports represents each floating ‘combined rail’ (i.e. rail and longitudinal sleeper), used earlier to discuss the low‐frequency free vibrations in the system, is again adopted to investigate the response due to a steadily moving load. We demonstrate that Fourier transforms can be invoked to obtain the forced deflexion, which depends upon the load speed. A contribution from the periodic supports determines the steady component of the deflexion moving with the load, and the other contributions from the supports produce oscillations. As is the case for a load moving over a beam or plate with continuous support, the response may be characterized using the free flexural wave dispersion relation—although there is now a countably infinite number of dispersion curves, corresponding to the existence of propagation bands in the periodic structure. The lowest wavenumber local minimum in the phase speed (coincident with the group speed) defines the primary critical load speed of most interest, at which the magnitude of the steady component accompanying the moving load becomes large. This primary critical load speed depends upon the relative elasticity of the discrete supports, which must not be too low if the floating ladder track is to be safe for fast rail systems. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.019 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".