MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998317975 · doi:10.1139/p01-135

Dimorphism and perturbed growth kinetics of cadmium sulfide thin films in a chemical working solution

2002· article· en· W1998317975 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
A. Zehe, A.A. Ramírez, J. Vázquez

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicChalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThin filmWurtzite crystal structureCrystalliteCadmium sulfideBand gapCrystallographySemiconductorPhysicsCondensed matter physicsChemical physicsMaterials scienceNanotechnologyHexagonal crystal systemChemistryOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thin films of numerous compound semiconductors, which crystallize in a (cubic) sphalerite structure, often display an alternative allotropic form as (hexagonal) wurtzite. The relative proportion of each depends in a characteristic manner on the growth conditions chosen. We applied an external magnetic flux during the growth of cadmium sulfide thin films from a chemical working solution, where the CdS molecules or small clusters are formed by a controlled reaction in an aqueous solution. The incorporation mechanism of such neutral particles into the polycrystalline CdS thin film is supposed to happen in a transition layer via a dissociation into charged constituents close to the growing interface. We found a clear effect of the external magnetic field on the film morphology, when the Lorentz force was acting parallel to the surface plane of the layer. Band-gap energy data from optical absorption measurements suggest dimorphism of the grown films, where the field application turns the commonly cubic crystal modification (E g = 2.38 eV) into a hexagonal polytype with a 200 meV larger energy gap. PACS Nos.: 81.05Dz, 81.15Lm, 81.15Aa, 81.70Fy, 82.65My, 82.80Ch, 82.80Ej

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.114
Threshold uncertainty score0.568

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicChalcogenide Semiconductor Thin FilmsFrench-language works237,207