MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998338277 · doi:10.1055/s-0032-1331380

Management of Pregnancy-Associated Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia Purpura

2012· article· en· W1998338277 on OpenAlexaff
Ashley Fyfe-Brown, Gwen Clarke, Kara Nerenberg, Sujata Chandra, Venu Jain

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Perinatology Reports · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicComplement system in diseases
Canadian institutionsRoyal Alexandra HospitalUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlasmapheresisHELLP syndromeMedicineThrombotic thrombocytopenic purpuraPregnancyPreeclampsiaFresh frozen plasmaPlateletpheresisGestationHemolysisPlateletObstetricsPurpura (gastropod)SurgeryPediatricsImmunologyApheresisAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thrombotic thrombocytopenia purpura (TTP) is an infrequent but serious disease. Pregnancy is a known risk factor for presentation or relapse of TTP. Difficulties in differentiating TTP from preeclampsia/HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets) syndrome, and current treatment recommendations are discussed in this case report. A woman with previously treated and stable TTP had a relapse at 36 weeks' gestation. Careful surveillance led to an early diagnosis. Severe disease in the peripartum period was treated successfully with cryosupernatant plasma-based plasmapheresis and platelet transfusion, with good maternal and neonatal outcomes. Cryosupernatant plasma is a viable alternative to fresh frozen plasma for plasmapheresis for TTP and may offer some therapeutic and logistical advantages. Platelet transfusion can be undertaken safely if needed to prevent or treat significant hemorrhage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Perinatology ReportsSame topicComplement system in diseasesFrench-language works237,207