Mast Cell Infiltration Discriminates between Histopathological Phenotypes of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RATIONALE: COPD is a complex disease with heterogeneous manifestations. Attempts have been made to define different phenotypes that could guide toward better disease understanding. We described before that smokers can develop either panlobular (PLE) or centrilobular emphysema (CLE). The latter has worse small airways remodeling and narrowing, which account for the airflow obstruction similar to asthma. OBJECTIVES: Because of the small airways involvement in CLE similar to asthma, we hypothesized a role for mast cells in CLE but not in PLE. Hence, we investigated mast cell infiltration, along with overall inflammation, and their relation with hyperreactivity and emphysema type in COPD. METHODS: We studied lung function, emphysema type, mast cells, and overall inflammation in small airways and alveolar walls, along with alveolar wall thickening in 67 subjects undergoing lung resection (59 smokers, 8 nonsmokers). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-seven smokers had CLE, 24 had PLE, and 8 had no emphysema. Mast cells were significantly increased in CLE compared with PLE and control subjects. Especially relevant was the mast cell increase in airway smooth muscle in CLE, which related significantly to airway hyperreactivity. CD4(+)T cells, neutrophils, and macrophages, but not eosinophils and CD8(+)T cells, were significantly higher in CLE than PLE. Alveolar wall thickness was increased in all smokers, but significantly more in CLE. CONCLUSIONS: The pathological phenotypes of COPD CLE and PLE show important differences in their overall inflammation with a protagonism of mast cells, which are related to airway reactivity. These findings highlight the distinctness of these COPD phenotypes and the role of mast cells in the pathophysiology of COPD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".