MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998367392 · doi:10.1115/icone17-76048

ACR-1000™ Level 1 PSA Summary

2009· article· en· W1998367392 on OpenAlexaffabout
Usha Menon, S. Aprodu, R. Bettig, R. P. Henderson, Trung Khien HA, P. Iliescu, Benyamin Karimi, M. El-Mansi, John P. Robinson, K. Torabi, E. Eman, Jing Wu, P. Santamaura

Bibliographic record

VenueVolume 2: Structural Integrity; Safety and Security; Advanced Applications of Nuclear Technology; Balance of Plant for Nuclear Applications · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicRisk and Safety Analysis
Canadian institutionsAtomic Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShutdownBoiler feedwaterDecay heatNuclear engineeringNatural circulationReliability engineeringWater coolingSystem safetyEngineeringEnvironmental scienceWaste managementBoiler (water heating)Mechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ACR-1000™ developed by Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL) is a 1200 MWe - pressure tube type, light-water-cooled and heavy-water-moderated reactor, which has evolved from the well-established CANDU™ line of reactors. It retains the basic proven CANDU design features while incorporating innovations and state-of-the-art technologies to ensure fully competitive safety, operation, performance and economics. The major innovation in the ACR-1000 is the use of slightly enriched uranium fuel and light water coolant. ACR-1000 is a four-quadrant design (for easier maintenance and improved reliability). There are five safety systems in the ACR-1000; (i) two independent, diverse and fast acting shutdown systems (SDS1 and SDS2), which are physically and functionally independent from each other and from the reactor regulating system; (ii) Emergency core cooling system; (iii) Emergency Feedwater system; and (iv) Containment system, which includes a strong steel-lined containment structure. In addition the Reserve water system provides feedwater to the heat transport system, steam generators, moderator and shield cooling system for beyond design basis accidents. The Level 1 Probabilistic Safety Assessment (PSA) is conducted in support of the design phase of the ACR-1000. The purpose of Level 1 PSA is to identify whether the ACR-1000 design targets and the regulatory safety goal for severe core damage frequency (SCDF) are met with adequate margin and provide design feedback. An interim Level 1 PSA was conducted for internal at-power events. Interim assessments were conducted for shutdown state, internal fire and flood at-power events. An interim seismic margin assessment was conducted for the seismic events. The Level 1 PSA results show that the ACR™ design targets and safety goal for SCDF are met with significant safety margin. Based on the ACR-1000 Level 1 PSA, the accident behaviours of the ACR-1000 are well understood and their consequences can be predicted with a high-level of confidence. It also provides sufficient assurance that the release based regulatory safety goals are achievable for ACR-1000. The Level 1 PSA results also signify a robust design that provides a strong foundation for the ACR-1000 design. The paper summarizes the Level 1 PSA program, methodology followed, the results obtained, and insights gained during the development of the ACR-1000 Level 1 PSA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.162
Threshold uncertainty score0.542

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1620.088

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVolume 2: Structural Integrity; Safety and Security; Advanced Applications of Nuclear Technology; Balance of Plant for Nuclear ApplicationsSame topicRisk and Safety AnalysisFrench-language works237,207