Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Adaptive Optics Observations of the Central Kinematics in M15
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have used an Imaging Fabry-Perot Spectrophotometer with the Adaptive Optics Bonnette on the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope to measure stellar radial velocities in the globular cluster M15. An average seeing of 0.15" full-width at half maximum, with the best-seeing image having 0.09", allowed us to measure accurately the velocities for five stars within 1" of the center of M15. Our estimate of the second moment of the velocity distribution inside a radius of 2" is 11.5 km/s, the same value we find out to a radius of about 6". However, the projected net rotation does increase dramatically at small radii, as our previous observations led us to suspect. The rotation amplitude inside a radius of 3.4" is v = 10.4 +- 2.7 km/s and the dispersion after removing the rotation is sigma = 10.3 +- 1.4 km/s, so v/sigma = 1 in this region. In addition, the position angle (PA) of the projected rotation axis differs by 100 degrees from that of the net cluster rotation at larger radii. Current theoretical models do not predict either this large an increase in the rotation amplitude or such a change in the PA. However, a central mass concentration, such as a black hole, could possibly sustain such a configuration. The rotation increase is consistent with the existence of a central dark mass concentration equal to 2500 M_solar.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it