MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998432398 · doi:10.1115/1.2005274

Frost Growth in Regenerative Wheels

2005· article· en· W1998432398 on OpenAlex
Wei Shang, Hong Chen, Robert W. Besant

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Heat Transfer · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat Transfer and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrost (temperature)AirflowPressure dropRelative humidityHumidityDrop (telecommunication)ASHRAE 90.1Environmental scienceMechanicsMaterials scienceMeteorologyMechanical engineeringComposite materialEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An experimental investigation was carried out for frost growth in a desiccant-coated regenerative wheel. The test facility was set up following ASHRAE Standard 84-1991R. Temperature, relative humidity, mass flow rate, and pressure drops were measured at each measuring station. Photos of frost within energy wheel flow channels show frost accumulation. The problem of frost growth within the narrow parallel flow passages of a regenerative heat or energy rotary wheel is formulated for a very cold-temperature ventilation application. Frost growth is assumed to grow as a porous media while the wheel is exposed to warm humid airflow on the exhaust side. While the wheel is exposed to cold dry airflow on the supply side, the frost is cooled but no frost grows. This cyclic frost growth and cooling process is continued with each wheel rotation. An analytical/numerical model is developed to simulate these frost properties over the depth of the wheel and as a function of time. Simulation results are used to interpret experimental data for the early stage of frost growth on a typical energy wheel with a cold supply air temperature of −40°C, a warm exhaust temperature of 20 °C and 40% relative humidity. Pressure drop measurements across a wheel taken for constant mass flow conditions revealed some very significant fluctuations of up to 100% of original pressure drop with a period ranging from 2 to 4 min for a wheel speed of 20 rpm. Each fluctuation in pressure drop is interpreted to imply a catastrophic failure of the outer frost layer sequenced over 1–2 min throughout the wheel followed by another frost growth period on top of a slightly thicker frost base.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.829
Threshold uncertainty score0.399

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it