MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998449729 · doi:10.1021/ja406833q

Modular Mesoionics: Understanding and Controlling Regioselectivity in 1,3-Dipolar Cycloadditions of Münchnone Derivatives

2013· article· en· W1998449729 on OpenAlexaff
Marie S. T. Morin, Daniel J. St‐Cyr, Bruce A. Arndtsen, Elizabeth H. Krenske, K. N. Houk

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMolecular Junctions and Nanostructures
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRegioselectivityChemistryReactivity (psychology)NucleophileComputational chemistryAlkyneMolecular orbitalMesoionicStructural isomerStereochemistryMedicinal chemistryOrganic chemistryMolecule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1,3-Dipolar cycloadditions of mesoionic 1,3-dipoles (Münchnones, imino-Münchnones, and phospha-Münchnones) with alkynes offer versatile, modular synthetic routes to pyrroles. Reactivity and regioselectivity differ markedly for different members of this series, and we report here the first general rationale for differences in reactivity by means of a systematic investigation of 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions involving electron-poor and electron-rich alkynes. Competition kinetic measurements indicate that Münchnones and phospha-Münchnones are nucleophilic 1,3-dipoles that react most rapidly with electron-poor alkynes. However, the regioselectivities of cycloadditions are found to undergo an inversion as a function of alkyne ionization potential. The exact point at which this occurs is different for the two dipoles, allowing rational control of the pyrrole formed. The origins of these reactivities and regioselectivities are examined computationally. Frontier molecular orbital predictions are found not to be accurate for these reactions, but transition state calculations give correct predictions of reactivity and selectivity, the origins of which can be analyzed using the distortion/interaction model of reactivity. Cycloadditions with electron-poor alkynes are shown to favor the regioisomer that has either the most favorable TS interaction energy (Münchnones or imino-Münchnones) or the smallest TS distortion energy (phospha-Münchnones). Cycloadditions with more electron-rich aryl-substituted alkynes, on the other hand, generally favor the regioisomer that has the smaller TS distortion energy. These insights delineate the synthetically important distinctions between Münchnones and phospha-Münchnones: phospha-Münchnones undergo highly regioselective cycloadditions with electron-poor alkynes that do not react selectively with Münchnones, and the reverse is true for cycloadditions of Münchnones with electron-rich alkynes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.242

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations63
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicMolecular Junctions and NanostructuresFrench-language works237,207