Triggered Instability of Liposomes Bound to Hydrophobically Modified Core−Shell PNIPAM Hydrogel Beads
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ability to trigger a destabilization of the membrane integrity of liposomes bound to environmentally sensitive hydrophobically modified core-shell hydrogel beads is demonstrated. Hydrogel beads with a core composed of poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) lightly cross-linked with bisacrylamide (BA) (pNIPAM) and a shell composed of NIPAM highly cross-linked with BA and containing varying amounts of acrylic acid (AA) [p(NIPAM-co-AA)] undergo a volume phase transition (VPT) at approximately 32 degrees C, as determined from (1)H magic angle spinning (MAS) NMR, regardless of the AA content of the shell. When the shell was hydrophobically modified with either decylamine or tetradecylamine, binding of extruded large unilamellar vesicles (eLUVs) composed of 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoylphosphatidylcholine (POPC) was quantitative, as determined via fluorescence spectroscopy. Fluorescence microscopy showed that such bound eLUVs did not fuse. Hydrogel-bound eLUV membrane permeability was assessed using (31)P MAS NMR in the presence of the chemical shift agent praseodymium and demonstrated that only at lower degrees of hydrophobic modification of the core-shell hydrogels was eLUV membrane barrier integrity maintained when T < VPT. At a low degree of hydrophobic modification, cycling the temperature above the VPT even for short periods caused the eLUV membranes to become leaky. Hence, eLUV membrane permeability was coupled to the hydrogel VPT, a situation that would be useful in applications requiring triggered release of liposomal contents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".