MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998489965 · doi:10.1021/pr0502121

Compositional Characterization of the Cytoskeleton of NK-Like Cells

2005· article· en· W1998489965 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaobo Meng, John A. Wilkins

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Proteome Research · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCytoskeletonCell biologyActinActin cytoskeletonBiologyMicrofilamentSecretionChemistryCellBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cytoskeleton is a dynamic structure that contributes to cell function in terms of shape, movement, transport and secretion. It also provides a platform for regional activities such as signaling, biosynthesis and energy production. The present manuscript describes a method for cytoskeleton isolation based on capture with magnetic microbeads and its application to the analysis of the NK like cell line, YTS. The isolated proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and the peptides from the in gel digested proteins were analyzed by on line nano-LC-MSMS. Approximately 76% of the 126 isolated proteins were either components of the cytoskeleton or proteins that were known to be capable of associating with the cytoskeleton. The enrichment was confirmed by western blot for actin and alpha-actinin. The isolation was dependent on intact actin microfilaments as pretreatment of cells with cytochalasin D resulted in a marked reduction in the number of proteins isolated. The method allowed for the identification of several proteins that have not been previously described in lymphoid cells (EPLIN, SETA). A number of other scaffolding and lipid raft associated proteins were described suggesting a link between the cytoskeleton and these structures. The approach may have application to the proteomic examination of the cytoskeleton in a variety of cell types.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.273

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Proteome ResearchSame topicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207