Structural Insight into the Mechanism of Activation of the Toll Receptor by the Dimeric Ligand Spätzle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Drosophila Toll receptor, which functions in both embryonic patterning and innate immunity to fungi and Gram-positive bacteria, is activated by a dimeric cytokine ligand, Spätzle (Spz). Previous studies have suggested that one Spz cross-links two Toll receptor molecules to form an activated complex. Here we report electron microscopy structures of the Toll ectodomain in the absence and presence of Spz. Contrary to expectations, Spz does not directly cross-link two Toll ectodomains. Instead, Spz binding at the N-terminal end of Toll predominantly induces the formation of a 2:2 complex, with two sites of interaction between the ectodomain chains, one located near to the N terminus of the solenoid and the other between the C-terminal juxtamembrane sequences. Moreover, Toll undergoes a ligand-induced conformational change, becoming more tightly curved than in the apo form. The unexpected 2:2 complex was confirmed by mass spectrometry under native conditions. These results suggest that activation of Toll is an allosteric mechanism induced by an end-on binding mode of its ligand Spz.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".