Signal‐to‐noise ratio for hyperpolarized <sup>3</sup>He MR imaging of human lungs: A 1.5 T and 3 T comparison
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The signal-to-noise ratio in hyperpolarized noble gas MR imaging is expected to be independent of field strength at frequencies typical of clinical systems (e.g., 1.5 T), where body noise dominates over coil noise. Furthermore, at higher fields (e.g., 3 T), the SNR of lung images may decline due to decreases in T(2) originating from increases in susceptibility-induced field gradients at the air-tissue interface. In this work, the SNR of hyperpolarized (3) He lung imaging at two commonly used clinical field strengths (1.5 T and 3 T) were compared in the same volunteers. Thermally polarized and hyperpolarized (3) He phantoms were used to account for differences in MR imaging system and (3) He polarizer performance, respectively, at the two field strengths. After correcting for T(2) values measured at 1.5 T (16 ± 2 ms) and 3 T (7 ± 1 ms), no significant difference in image SNR between the two field strengths was observed, consistent with theory.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".