Combining PARAFAC Analysis of HPLC-PDA Profiles and Structural Characterization Using HPLC-PDA-SPE-NMR-MS Experiments: Commercial Preparations of St. John's Wort
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Herbal preparations represent very complex mixtures, potentially containing multiple pharmacologically active entities. Methods for global characterization of the composition of such mixtures are therefore of pertinent interest. In this work, chemometric analysis of high-performance liquid chromatography with photodiode-array detection (HPLC-PDA) data from extracts of commercial preparations of Hypericum perforatum (St. John's wort) that originate from several continents is described. The spectral HPLC profiles were aligned in the elution mode using correlation optimized warping in order to remove peak misalignment caused by retention time shifts due to matrix effects. Furthermore, the warping was assisted by HPLC-PDA-SPE-NMR-MS (SPE = solid-phase extraction) experiments that yielded 1H NMR and 13C NMR data (from 1H-detected heteronuclear correlations), as well as ESI-MS and HRMS data, which enabled the identification of all major mixture constituents. The preprocessed HPLC-PDA data were subjected to parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC), a chemometric method that is a generalization of principal component analysis (PCA) to multi-way data arrays. PCA of the peak areas obtained from the PARAFAC analysis was used to facilitate sample comparison and allowed straightforward interpretation of constituents responsible for the differences in composition between individual preparations. In addition, loadings from the PARAFAC analysis provided pure elution profiles and pure UV spectra even for coeluting peaks, thus enabling the identification of chromatographically unresolved components. In conclusion, PARAFAC analysis of the readily accessible HPLC-PDA data provides the means for unsupervised and unbiased assessment of the composition of herbal preparations, of interest for assessment of their pharmacological activity and clinical efficacy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".